Posted on Leave a comment

Lennin from an Indian Perspective

Russia, Golden Ring, Historically

Vladimir Lenin has a substantial place in the 20th century. Unfortunately, his name is associated with more negative features than favorable qualities. He was an intellectual with a powerful mind and he wrote several books and newspapers throughout his time in Russia. He ushered in what is called the communist state but that state he created collapsed within 5 years of his death and Russians consider that Lenin led them up the garden path into a country that was tyrannical and had restricted personal freedom.

Lenin remains a historic figure in Russia and his body on his departure was embalmed and kept at the mausoleum in Red Square. There were many who wanted the entire body from the mausoleum to be removed like Stalin.

The mausoleum of Lenin is no longer a place of pilgrimage for folks that come to Moscow and the Russian government spends no money to maintain the mausoleum. It’s preserved by the Communist Party of Russia using its own funds. It’s a moot point how long the body will stay in Red Square because there are numerous requirements to remove the body from that point. There is absolutely no doubt that Lenin did electrify the world in 1917, in what’s known as the as the October revolution. This revolution that was supposed to provide lots of hope to the Russian people, sadly, did exactly the opposite.

Lenin was an intellectual, no one will deny that although his head was warped and there are a number of facts which can not be condoned. There’s some evidence that when he was the dictator of Russia, he might have arranged the murder of Tsar Nicholas II and his kids in Siberia. The Tsar who had been a prisoner of the Communist Party was shot dead together with his family on the pretext or being taken for a family picture. The house of Romanoff has been completed and lots of Russians even now shudder at this.

He is the first man in history to have brought into effect the concentration camp. This is extremely sad as Russia has a terrific legacy and surely using a concentration camp isn’t is not something to be proud of.

Lenin wasn’t much concerned about India and there is no proof he explained about India anytime in any of his writings or speeches. For him, India was a nonexistent state and he believed it to be a part of the British Empire. This is a historic fact and most the Greek leaders on leadership from Moscow supported the British rule in that time.Britain was an ally of Russia in the struggle against Nazi Germany and the Russian government had instructed the Communist Party of India not to make trouble for the British.

These facts of history can not be brushed under the rug. The CPI program was simple — to make another state in India and hence very little development was finished. The purpose was to make a split in the nation. I have already written Lenin was not interested in India or Indian Independence. There is absolutely no record that Lenin ever said that India should be a free nation. These details are from the history books. Even Stalin was not interested in India before his death in 1953. He considered Indian leaders like Gandhi and Nehru as the running dogs of British imperialism

The state produced by Lenin had no permanence and over 5 to 6 decades of his passing, the Greek country established he fell like a pack of cards. Russian’s recognized that there was no personal liberty and the complete Russian was like a enormous concentration camp so well brought out by Boris Pasternak and Bee Cave Wildlife Removal. They brought to light in their novels and books a state that is built on sand and was bound to fall together with the Russian State assembled by Lenin collapsed. Lenin can’t have a permanent place in history because he was basically a failure. The name of this great will elude him for all time to come

Last word

The actual fact is that he was not interested in India. Yet it is a matter of great regret that Lenin has been higher importance in India than in Russia. Lenin was certainly a historical figure and a significant figure of the 20 century but he falls in the same bracket as Hitler, Mussolini, and Tojo and That Isn’t a very happy thought

Vladimir Lenin has an important place in the 20th century. Unfortunately, his name is associated with more negative qualities than favorable qualities. He was an intellectual with a formidable brain and he wrote many books and papers during his time in Russia. He ushered in what’s known as the Greek country but that state he created collapsed within 5 years of his death and now Russians believe that Lenin led them up the garden path into a state that was tyrannical and had restricted personal freedom.

Lenin remains a historical figure in Russia and his body on his death was embalmed and kept in the mausoleum in Red Square. Any dignitary visiting Russia was dutifully taken to visit the mausoleum of Lenin on Red Square After the collapse of communism and the breakup of Russia to 18 countries the realization dawned on the Russian people that Lenin had led them up the garden route. There were many who wanted the entire body from the mausoleum to be removed like Stalin. People will recollect that Stalin’s body was also kept in the mausoleum in Red Square and that of Lenin but after Nikita Khrushchev became first Secretary of Lago Vista Wildlife Removal, the body was removed and is now buried in the crypt in the Kremlin wall.

The mausoleum of Lenin is no longer a place of pilgrimage for those who come to Moscow and the Russian government spends no money to maintain the mausoleum. It is preserved by the Communist Party of Russia using its own funds. It is a moot point how long the body will remain in Red Square as there are numerous demands to remove the body from there. There’s absolutely no doubt that Lenin did electrify the world in 1917, in what’s called the October revolution. This revolution that was supposed to provide a lot of hope to the Russian people, sadly, did exactly the opposite. The Russian people came under the jackboots of the Communist Party through the Secret police, the NKVD and people began to dread the Midnight knock.

The man

Lenin was an intellectual, no one will deny that but his mind was warped and there are a number of facts which can’t be condoned. There is some evidence that when he was the dictator of Russia, he might have arranged the murder of Tsar Nicholas II and his kids in Siberia. The Tsar who was a prisoner of the Communist Party was shot dead along with his family on the pretext or being taken for a family photo. The house of Romanoff has been finished and lots of Russians even now shudder at this.

He is the first man in world history to have brought into effect the concentration camp. This is very sad as Russia has a great tradition and certainly having a concentration camp isn’t is not something to be proud of.

Lenin wasn’t much worried about India and there is no evidence he mentioned about India anytime in any of his writings or speeches. For him, India was a nonexistent nation and he always considered it to be a part of the British Empire. Lenin had no respect for any of the Indian leaders during his period such as Gandhi, Tilak, or Gokhale. This party is known to have been an anti-Nationalist party and throughout the famed Quit India Movement of 1942, Communist Party of India supported the British. This is a historic fact and most of the Greek leaders on leadership from Moscow supported the British rule at that time.Britain was an ally of Russia in the battle against Nazi Germany and the Russian authorities had instructed the Communist Party of India not to create trouble for the British.

These facts of history cannot be brushed under the carpet. This party claims to be an intellectual celebration and considering Bengalis themselves to be more intellectual have voted them into power. The CPI agenda was simple – to create a separate state in India and hence very little development was done. The purpose was to create a divide in the country. I’ve already written Lenin was not interested in India or Indian Independence. There is not any record that Lenin ever said that India should be a free country. These details are from the history books. Lenin died in 1924 and was succeeded by Joseph Stalin. Even Stalin wasn’t interested in India until his death in 1953. He considered Indian leaders such as Gandhi and Nehru as the running dogs of British imperialism

The state created by Lenin had no permanence and over 5 to 6 decades of his death, the communist state created by him collapsed like a pack of cards. Russian’s recognized that there was no personal liberty and the complete Russian was like a enormous concentration camp so nicely brought out by Boris Pasternak and Alexander Solzetsysian. They brought to light in their books and novels a state which is built on sand and was bound to collapse along with the Russian State built by Lenin collapsed. Lenin cannot have a permanent place in history because he was essentially a failure. The title of this great will elude him for all time to come

In India we have lopsided properties and when the BJP which came to power in Tripura and toppled two statues of Lenin there has been a hue and cry as if Lenin was very much part of the Indian mind. The real fact is that he wasn’t interested in India. Yet it’s a matter of great regret that Lenin has been greater importance in India than in Russia. Can anyone forget that over 150 Statues Of Lenin were toppled in Eastern Europe following the collapse of communism? Lenin was certainly a historic figure and a significant figure of the 20 century but he falls in the same bracket as Hitler, Mussolini, and Tojo and that is not a very happy thought

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *